Skip Navigation


Genome Biology and Evolution Advance Access originally published online on August 13, 2009
Genome Biology and Evolution (2009) Vol. 2009:308; doi:10.1093/gbe/evp030 published on September 4, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
2009/0/308    most recent
evp030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Email alerts
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, J. B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, J. B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses?by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Nonlinear Dynamics of Nonsynonymous (dN) and Synonymous (dS) Substitution Rates Affects Inference of Selection

Jochen B. W. Wolf, Axel Künstner, Kiwoong Nam, Mattias Jakobsson and Hans Ellegren

Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

E-mail: wolf{at}evolbio.mpg.de.


  Abstract

Selection modulates gene sequence evolution in different ways by constraining potential changes of amino acid sequences (purifying selection) or by favoring new and adaptive genetic variants (positive selection). The number of nonsynonymous differences in a pair of protein-coding sequences can be used to quantify the mode and strength of selection. To control for regional variation in substitution rates, the proportionate number of nonsynonymous differences (dN) is divided by the proportionate number of synonymous differences (dS). The resulting ratio (dN/dS) is a widely used indicator for functional divergence to identify particular genes that underwent positive selection. With the ever-growing amount of genome data, summary statistics like mean dN/dS allow gathering information on the mode of evolution for entire species. Both applications hinge on the assumption that dS and mean dS (~branch length) are neutral and adequately control for variation in substitution rates across genes and across organisms, respectively. We here explore the validity of this assumption using empirical data based on whole-genome protein sequence alignments between human and 15 other vertebrate species and several simulation approaches. We find that dN/dS does not appropriately reflect the action of selection as it is strongly influenced by its denominator (dS). Particularly for closely related taxa, such as human and chimpanzee, dN/dS can be misleading and is not an unadulterated indicator of selection. Instead, we suggest that inconsistencies in the behavior of dN/dS are to be expected and highlight the idea that this behavior may be inherent to taking the ratio of two randomly distributed variables that are nonlinearly correlated. New null hypotheses will be needed to adequately handle these nonlinear dynamics.

Keywords: positive selection, negative selection, protein evolution, selection models, dN/dS ratio, neutral theory, adaptive evolution, melanocortin-1-receptor

Accepted August 10, 2009

Laurence Hurst, Associate Editor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.