<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Genome Biology and Evolution - recent issues</title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Genome Biology and Evolution - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1759-6653</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Genome Biology and Evolution</prism:publicationName>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/23?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/34?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/45?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/67?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/75?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/114?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/119?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/145?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Welcome to Genome Biology and Evolution]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gojobori, T., Martin, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Welcome to Genome Biology and Evolution]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Independent Mammalian Genome Contractions Following the KT Boundary]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although it is generally accepted that major changes in the earth's history are significant drivers of phylogenetic diversification and extinction, such episodes may also have long-lasting effects on genomic architecture. Here we show that widespread reductions in genome size have occurred in multiple lineages of mammals subsequent to the Cretaceous&ndash;Tertiary (KT) boundary, whereas there is no evidence for such changes in other vertebrate, invertebrate, or land plant lineages. Although the mechanisms remain unclear, such shifts in mammalian genome evolution may be a consequence of an increase in the efficiency of selection against excess DNA resulting from post-KT population size expansions. Independent historical changes in genome architecture in diverse lineages raise a significant challenge to the idea that genome size is finely tuned to achieve adaptive phenotypic modifications and suggest that attempts to use phylogenetic analysis to infer ancestral genome sizes may be problematical.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rho, M., Zhou, M., Gao, X., Kim, S., Tang, H., Lynch, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Independent Mammalian Genome Contractions Following the KT Boundary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>12</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence That Replication-Associated Mutation Alone Does Not Explain Between-Chromosome Differences In Substitution Rates]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Since Haldane first noticed an excess of paternally derived mutations, it has been considered that most mutations derive from errors during germ line replication. Miyata et al. (1987) proposed that differences in the rate of neutral evolution on X, Y, and autosome can be employed to measure the extent of this male bias. This commonly applied method assumes replication to be the sole source of between-chromosome variation in substitution rates. We propose a simple test of this assumption: If true, estimates of the male bias should be independent of which two chromosomal classes are compared. Prior evidence from rodents suggested that this might not be true, but conclusions were limited by a lack of rat Y-linked sequence. We therefore sequenced two rat Y-linked bacterial artificial chromosomes and determined evolutionary rate by comparison with mouse. For estimation of rates we consider both introns and synonymous rates. Surprisingly, for both data sets the prediction of congruent estimates of  is strongly rejected. Indeed, some comparisons suggest a female bias with autosomes evolving faster than Y-linked sequence. We conclude that the method of Miyata et al. (1987) has the potential to provide incorrect estimates. Correcting the method requires understanding of the other causes of substitution that might differ between chromosomal classes. One possible cause is recombination-associated substitution bias for which we find some evidence. We note that if, as some suggest, this association is dominantly owing to male recombination, the high estimates of  seen in birds is to be expected as Z chromosomes recombine in males.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pink, C. J., Swaminathan, S. K., Dunham, I., Rogers, J., Ward, A., Hurst, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence That Replication-Associated Mutation Alone Does Not Explain Between-Chromosome Differences In Substitution Rates]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>22</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/23?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abundant Indispensable Redundancies in Cellular Metabolic Networks]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/23?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cellular life is a highly redundant complex system; yet, the evolutionary maintenance of the redundancy remains unexplained. Using a systems biology approach, we infer that 37&ndash;47% of metabolic reactions in <I>Escherichia coli</I> and yeast can be individually removed without blocking the production of any biomass component under any nutritional condition. However, the majority of these redundant reactions are preserved because they have differential maximal efficiencies at different conditions or their loss causes an immediate fitness reduction that can only be regained via mutation, drift, and selection in evolution. The remaining redundancies are attributable to pleiotropic effects or recent horizontal gene transfers. We find that <I>E. coli</I> and yeast exhibit opposite relationships between the functional importance and redundancy level of a reaction, which is inconsistent with the conjecture that redundancies are preserved as an adaptation to back up important parts in the system. Interestingly, the opposite relationships can both be recapitulated by a simple model in which the natural environments of the organisms change frequently. Thus, adaptive backup is neither necessary nor sufficient to explain the high redundancy of cellular metabolic networks. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that redundant reactions are not kept as backups and that the genetic robustness of metabolic networks is an evolutionary by-product.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, Z., Zhang, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abundant Indispensable Redundancies in Cellular Metabolic Networks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/34?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the Origin and Evolution of Vertebrate Olfactory Receptor Genes: Comparative Genome Analysis Among 23 Chordate Species]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/34?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Olfaction is a primitive sense in organisms. Both vertebrates and insects have receptors for detecting odor molecules in the environment, but the evolutionary origins of these genes are different. Among studied vertebrates, mammals have ~1,000 olfactory receptor (OR) genes, whereas teleost fishes have much smaller (~100) numbers of OR genes. To investigate the origin and evolution of vertebrate OR genes, I attempted to determine near-complete OR gene repertoires by searching whole-genome sequences of 14 nonmammalian chordates, including cephalochordates (amphioxus), urochordates (ascidian and larvacean), and vertebrates (sea lamprey, elephant shark, five teleost fishes, frog, lizard, and chicken), followed by a large-scale phylogenetic analysis in conjunction with mammalian OR genes identified from nine species. This analysis showed that the amphioxus has &gt;30 vertebrate-type OR genes though it lacks distinctive olfactory organs, whereas all OR genes appear to have been lost in the urochordate lineage. Some groups of genes (, , and ) that are phylogenetically nested within vertebrate OR genes showed few gene gains and losses, which is in sharp contrast to the evolutionary pattern of OR genes, suggesting that they are actually non-OR genes. Moreover, the analysis demonstrated a great difference in OR gene repertoires between aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates, reflecting the necessity for the detection of water-soluble and airborne odorants, respectively. However, a minor group (&beta;) of genes that are atypically present in both aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates was also found. These findings should provide a critical foundation for further physiological, behavioral, and evolutionary studies of olfaction in various organisms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niimura, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the Origin and Evolution of Vertebrate Olfactory Receptor Genes: Comparative Genome Analysis Among 23 Chordate Species]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/45?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coevolution of DNA Uptake Sequences and Bacterial Proteomes]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/45?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Dramatic examples of repeated sequences occur in the genomes of some naturally competent bacteria, which contain hundreds or thousands of copies of short motifs called DNA uptake signal sequences. Here, we analyze the evolutionary interactions between coding-region uptake sequences and the proteomes of <I>Haemophilus influenzae</I>, <I>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</I>, and <I>Neisseria meningitidis</I>. In all three genomes, uptake sequence accumulation in coding sequences has approximately doubled the frequencies of those tripeptides specified by each species&rsquo; uptake sequence. The presence of uptake sequences in particular reading frames correlated most strongly with the use of preferred codons at degenerately coded positions, but the density of uptake sequences correlated only poorly with protein functional category. Genes lacking homologs in related genomes also lacked uptake sequences, strengthening the evidence that uptake sequences do not drive lateral gene transfer between distant relatives but instead accumulate after genes have been transferred. Comparison of the uptake sequence-encoded peptides of <I>H. influenzae</I> and <I>N. meningitidis</I> proteins with their homologs from related bacteria without uptake sequences indicated that uptake sequences were also preferentially located in poorly conserved genes and at poorly conserved amino acids. With few exceptions, amino acids at positions encoded by uptake sequences were as well conserved as other amino acids, suggesting that extant uptake sequences impose little or no constraint on coding for protein function. However, this state is likely to be achieved at a substantial cost because of the selective deaths required to eliminate maladaptive mutations that improve uptake sequences.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Findlay, W. A., Redfield, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coevolution of DNA Uptake Sequences and Bacterial Proteomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Footprints of Inversions at Present and Past Pseudoautosomal Boundaries in Human Sex Chromosomes]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The human sex chromosomes have stopped recombining gradually, which has left five evolutionary strata on the X chromosome. Y inversions are thought to have suppressed X&ndash;Y recombination but clear evidence is missing. Here, we looked for such evidence by focusing on a region&mdash;the X-added region (XAR)&mdash;that includes the pseudoautosomal region and the most recent strata 3 to 5. We estimated and analyzed the whole set of parsimonious scenarios of Y inversions given the gene order in XAR and its Y homolog. Comparing these to scenarios for simulated sequences suggests that the strata 4 and 5 were formed by Y inversions. By comparing the X and Y DNA sequences, we found clear evidence of two Y inversions associated with duplications that coincide with the boundaries of strata 4 and 5. Divergence between duplicates is in agreement with the timing of strata 4 and 5 formation. These duplicates show a complex pattern of gene conversion that resembles the pattern previously found for <I>AMELXY</I>, a stratum 3 locus. This suggests that this locus&mdash;despite <I>AMELY</I> being unbroken&mdash;was possibly involved in a Y inversion that formed stratum 3. However, no clear evidence supporting the formation of stratum 3 by a Y inversion was found, probably because this stratum is too old for such an inversion to be detectable. Our results strongly support the view that the most recent human strata have arisen by Y inversions and suggest that inversions have played a major role in the differentiation of our sex chromosomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lemaitre, C., Braga, M. D. V., Gautier, C., Sagot, M.-F., Tannier, E., Marais, G. A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Footprints of Inversions at Present and Past Pseudoautosomal Boundaries in Human Sex Chromosomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/67?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Locus-Specific Decoupling of Base Composition Evolution at Synonymous Sites and Introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia Lineages]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/67?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Selection is thought to be partially responsible for patterns of molecular evolution at synonymous sites within numerous <I>Drosophila</I> species. Recently, "per-site" and likelihood methods have been developed to detect loci for which positive selection is a major component of synonymous site evolution. An underlying assumption of these methods, however, is a homogeneous mutation process. To address this potential shortcoming, we perform a complementary analysis making gene-by-gene comparisons of paired synonymous site and intron substitution rates toward and away from the nucleotides G and C because preferred codons are G or C ending in Drosophila. This comparison may reduce both the false-positive rate (due to broadscale heterogeneity in mutation) and false-negative rate (due to lack of power comparing small numbers of sites) of the per-site and likelihood methods. We detect loci with patterns of evolution suggestive of synonymous site selection pressures predominately favoring unpreferred and preferred codons along the <I>Drosophila melanogaster</I> and <I>Drosophila sechellia</I> lineages, respectively. Intron selection pressures do not appear sufficient to explain all these results as the magnitude of the difference in synonymous and intron evolution is dependent on recombination environment and chromosomal location in a direction supporting the hypothesis of selectively driven synonymous fixations. This comparison identifies 101 loci with an apparent switch in codon preference between <I>D. melanogaster</I> and <I>D. sechellia</I>, a pattern previously only observed at the <I>Notch</I> locus.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bauer DuMont, V. L., Singh, N. D., Wright, M. H., Aquadro, C. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Locus-Specific Decoupling of Base Composition Evolution at Synonymous Sites and Introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia Lineages]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/75?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent amplification and impact of MITEs on the genome of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/75?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) are a particular type of defective class II transposons present in genomes as highly homogeneous populations of small elements. Their high copy number and close association to genes make their potential impact on gene evolution particularly relevant. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the MITE families directly related to grapevine "cut-and-paste" transposons. Our results show that grapevine MITEs have transduplicated and amplified genomic sequences, including gene sequences and fragments of other mobile elements. Our results also show that although some of the MITE families were already present in the ancestor of the European and American <I>Vitis</I> wild species, they have been amplified and have been actively transposing accompanying grapevine domestication and breeding. We show that MITEs are abundant in grapevine and some of them are frequently inserted within the untranslated regions of grapevine genes. MITE insertions are highly polymorphic among grapevine cultivars, which frequently generate transcript variability. The data presented here show that MITEs have greatly contributed to the grapevine genetic diversity which has been used for grapevine domestication and breeding.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjak, A., Boue, S., Forneck, A., Casacuberta, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent amplification and impact of MITEs on the genome of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring Transcription Factor-Binding Site Turnover: A Maximum Likelihood Approach Using Phylogenies]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A major mode of gene expression evolution is based on changes in cis-regulatory elements (CREs) whose function critically depends on the presence of transcription factor&ndash;binding sites (TFBS). Because CREs experience extensive TFBS turnover even with conserved function, alignment-based studies of CRE sequence evolution are limited to very closely related species. Here, we propose an alternative approach based on a stochastic model of TFBS turnover. We implemented a maximum likelihood model that permits variable turnover rates in different parts of the species tree. This model can be used to detect changes in turnover rate as a proxy for differences in the selective pressures acting on TFBS in different clades. We applied this method to five TFBS in the fungi methionine biosynthesis pathway and three TFBS in the HoxA clusters of vertebrates. We find that the estimated turnover rate is generally high, with half-life ranging between ~5 and 150 My and a mode around tens of millions of years. This rate is consistent with the finding that even functionally conserved enhancers can show very low sequence similarity. We also detect statistically significant differences in the equilibrium densities of estrogen- and progesterone-response elements in the HoxA clusters between mammal and nonmammal vertebrates. Even more extreme clade-specific differences were found in the fungal data. We conclude that stochastic models of TFBS turnover enable the detection of shifts in the selective pressures acting on CREs in different organisms.</p>
<p>The analysis tool, called CRETO (Cis-Regulatory Element Turn-Over) can be downloaded from <inter-ref locator="http://www.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/Software/creto/" locator-type="url">http://www.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/Software/creto/</inter-ref>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otto, W., Stadler, P. F., Lopez-Giraldez, F., Townsend, J. P., Lynch, V. J., Wagner, G. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring Transcription Factor-Binding Site Turnover: A Maximum Likelihood Approach Using Phylogenies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont-Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The deep phylogeny of eukaryotes is an important but extremely difficult problem of evolutionary biology. Five eukaryotic supergroups are relatively well established but the relationship between these supergroups remains elusive, and their divergence seems to best fit a "Big Bang" model. Attempts were made to root the tree of eukaryotes by using potential derived shared characters such as unique fusions of conserved genes. One popular model of eukaryotic evolution that emerged from this type of analysis is the unikont&ndash;bikont phylogeny: The unikont branch consists of Metazoa, Choanozoa, Fungi, and Amoebozoa, whereas bikonts include the rest of eukaryotes, namely, Plantae (green plants, Chlorophyta, and Rhodophyta), Chromalveolata, excavates, and Rhizaria. We reexamine the relationships between the eukaryotic supergroups using a genome-wide analysis of rare genomic changes (RGCs) associated with multiple, conserved amino acids (RGC_CAMs and RGC_CAs), to resolve trifurcations of major eukaryotic lineages. The results do not support the basal position of Chromalveolata with respect to Plantae and unikonts or the monophyly of the bikont group and appear to be best compatible with the monophyly of unikonts and Chromalveolata. Chromalveolata show a distinct, additional signal of affinity with Plantae, conceivably, owing to genes transferred from the secondary, red algal symbiont. Excavates are derived forms, with extremely long branches that complicate phylogenetic inference; nevertheless, the RGC analysis suggests that they are significantly more likely to cluster with the unikont&ndash;Chromalveolata assemblage than with the Plantae. Thus, the first split in eukaryotic evolution might lie between photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic forms and so could have been triggered by the endosymbiosis between an ancestral unicellular eukaryote and a cyanobacterium that gave rise to the chloroplast.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogozin, I. B., Basu, M. K., Csuros, M., Koonin, E. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont-Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/114?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimates of Positive Darwinian Selection Are Inflated by Errors in Sequencing, Annotation, and Alignment]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/114?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Published estimates of the proportion of positively selected genes (PSGs) in human vary over three orders of magnitude. In mammals, estimates of the proportion of PSGs cover an even wider range of values. We used 2,980 orthologous protein-coding genes from human, chimpanzee, macaque, dog, cow, rat, and mouse as well as an established phylogenetic topology to infer the fraction of PSGs in all seven terminal branches. The inferred fraction of PSGs ranged from 0.9% in human through 17.5% in macaque to 23.3% in dog. We found three factors that influence the fraction of genes that exhibit telltale signs of positive selection: the quality of the sequence, the degree of misannotation, and ambiguities in the multiple sequence alignment. The inferred fraction of PSGs in sequences that are deficient in all three criteria of coverage, annotation, and alignment is 7.2 times higher than that in genes with high trace sequencing coverage, "known" annotation status, and perfect alignment scores. We conclude that some estimates on the prevalence of positive Darwinian selection in the literature may be inflated and should be treated with caution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schneider, A., Souvorov, A., Sabath, N., Landan, G., Gonnet, G. H., Graur, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimates of Positive Darwinian Selection Are Inflated by Errors in Sequencing, Annotation, and Alignment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>118</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/119?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Calibration of Mutation Rates Reveals Diverse Subfamily Structure of Galliform CR1 Repeats]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/119?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Chicken Repeat 1 (CR1) repeats are the most abundant family of repeats in the chicken genome, with more than 200,000 copies accounting for ~80% of the chicken interspersed repeats. CR1 repeats are believed to have arisen from the retrotransposition of a small number of master elements, which gave rise to the 22 CR1 subfamilies as previously reported in Repbase. We performed a global assessment of the divergence distributions, phylogenies, and consensus sequences of CR1 repeats in the chicken genome. We identified and validated 57 chicken CR1 subfamilies and further analyzed the correlation between these subfamilies and their regional GC contents. We also discovered one novel lineage-specific CR1 subfamilies in turkeys when compared with chickens. We built an evolutionary tree of these subfamilies and concluded that CR1 repeats may play an important role in reshaping the structure of bird genomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, G. E., Jiang, L., Tian, F., Zhu, B., Song, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Calibration of Mutation Rates Reveals Diverse Subfamily Structure of Galliform CR1 Repeats]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>119</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Similarly Strong Purifying Selection Acts on Human Disease Genes of All Evolutionary Ages]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A number of studies have showed that recently created genes differ from the genes created in deep evolutionary past in many aspects. Here, we determined the age of emergence and propensity for gene loss (PGL) of all human protein&ndash;coding genes and compared disease genes with non-disease genes in terms of their evolutionary rate, strength of purifying selection, mRNA expression, and genetic redundancy. The older and the less prone to loss, non-disease genes have been evolving 1.5- to 3-fold slower between humans and chimps than young non-disease genes, whereas Mendelian disease genes have been evolving very slowly regardless of their ages and PGL. Complex disease genes showed an intermediate pattern. Disease genes also have higher mRNA expression heterogeneity across multiple tissues than non-disease genes regardless of age and PGL. Young and middle-aged disease genes have fewer similar paralogs as non-disease genes of the same age. We reasoned that genes were more likely to be involved in human disease if they were under a strong functional constraint, expressed heterogeneously across tissues, and lacked genetic redundancy. Young human genes that have been evolving under strong constraint between humans and chimps might also be enriched for genes that encode important primate or even human-specific functions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cai, J. J., Borenstein, E., Chen, R., Petrov, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Similarly Strong Purifying Selection Acts on Human Disease Genes of All Evolutionary Ages]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/145?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deletional Bias across the Three Domains of Life]]></title>
<link>http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2009/0/145?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Elevated levels of genetic drift are hypothesized to be a dominant factor that influences genome size evolution across all life-forms. However, increased levels of drift appear to be correlated with genome expansion in eukaryotes but with genome contraction in bacteria, suggesting that these two groups of organisms experience vastly different mutational inputs and selective constraints. To determine the contribution of small insertion and deletion events to the differences in genome organization between eukaryotes and prokaryotes, we systematically surveyed 17 taxonomic groups across the three domains of life. Based on over 5,000 indel events in noncoding regions, we found that deletional events outnumbered insertions in all groups examined. The extent of deletional bias, when measured by the total length of insertions to deletions, revealed a marked disparity between eukaryotes and prokaryotes, whereas the ratio was close to one in the three eukaryotic groups examined, deletions outweighed insertions by at least a factor of 10 in most prokaryotes. Moreover, the strength of deletional bias is associated with the proportion of coding regions in prokaryotic genomes. Considering that genetic drift is a stochastic process and does not discriminate the exact nature of mutations, the degree of bias toward deletions provides an explanation to the differential responses of eukaryotes and prokaryotes to elevated levels of drift. Furthermore, deletional bias, rather than natural selection, is the primary mechanism by which the compact gene packing within most prokaryotic genomes is maintained.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuo, C.-H., Ochman, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/gbe/evp016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deletional Bias across the Three Domains of Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>0</prism:number>
<prism:volume>2009</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>152</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>145</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>